Entry tags:
In Which Orson Scott Card Misses The Point And Is A Tool
So, in his infinite wisdom, Orson Scott Card decided to rewrite Hamlet. As one might expect, this did not turn out very well, as detailed in this review.
It's not just a terrible book, though, it's also disgustingly bigoted. Unfortunately, this is also not surprise to those who have followed the author's career. Now, like the review, I'm going to spoil the big plot twist OSC decided to add to Hamlet. You'll be glad I did.
The reviewer, William Alexander, explains:
The extent of the novella's failure is surprising—and embarrassing, given that Card is a skilled veteran novelist and Subterranean a well-respected press. The most polite thing for us to do would be to walk away and quietly forget the whole painful exercise. But Card does not deserve our polite amnesia. His failures should be known and remembered, because the revelation in his "revelatory new version" turns out to be a nightmare of vitriolic homophobia.
Here's the punch line: Old King Hamlet was an inadequate king because he was gay, an evil person because he was gay, and, ultimately, a demonic and ghostly father of lies who convinces young Hamlet to exact imaginary revenge on innocent people. The old king was actually murdered by Horatio, in revenge for molesting him as a young boy—along with Laertes, and Rosencrantz, and Guildenstern, thereby turning all of them gay."
Oh, Orson Scott Card. How did this happen to the guy who wrote Ender's Game? I know being a good writer is no defense against being a homophobic bigot, but I thought it might prevent someone from catastrophically MISSING THE POINT OF HAMLET.
And people wonder why I refused to read OSC's Dragon Age comic series despite being completely obsessed with the universe.
It's not just a terrible book, though, it's also disgustingly bigoted. Unfortunately, this is also not surprise to those who have followed the author's career. Now, like the review, I'm going to spoil the big plot twist OSC decided to add to Hamlet. You'll be glad I did.
The reviewer, William Alexander, explains:
The extent of the novella's failure is surprising—and embarrassing, given that Card is a skilled veteran novelist and Subterranean a well-respected press. The most polite thing for us to do would be to walk away and quietly forget the whole painful exercise. But Card does not deserve our polite amnesia. His failures should be known and remembered, because the revelation in his "revelatory new version" turns out to be a nightmare of vitriolic homophobia.
Here's the punch line: Old King Hamlet was an inadequate king because he was gay, an evil person because he was gay, and, ultimately, a demonic and ghostly father of lies who convinces young Hamlet to exact imaginary revenge on innocent people. The old king was actually murdered by Horatio, in revenge for molesting him as a young boy—along with Laertes, and Rosencrantz, and Guildenstern, thereby turning all of them gay."
Oh, Orson Scott Card. How did this happen to the guy who wrote Ender's Game? I know being a good writer is no defense against being a homophobic bigot, but I thought it might prevent someone from catastrophically MISSING THE POINT OF HAMLET.
And people wonder why I refused to read OSC's Dragon Age comic series despite being completely obsessed with the universe.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
And, you know, there are people who've done cool things with re-writing or remixing Hamlet; it's not an exercise that's automatically doomed to failure. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead, for example, is awesome. It is, of course, also notably lacking in homophobia.
no subject
no subject
Thankfully, I've never read anything by OSC.
no subject
no subject
I, too, don't have to feel conflicted about Card, since I've never read Ender's Game, and thanks to its author's antics, never will.
no subject
As Neotoma notes, I'm so glad I gave up Card years ago. Ugh.
no subject
no subject
Heh. Tempted to meta-quote this :)
no subject
no subject